Railroad fuel surcharge antitrust case

Author: fcnu

August undefined, 2024

Webclass certification in a case alleging that the four largest U.S. railroads — BNSF Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, CSX Transportation Inc. and Norfolk Southern Railway Company — conspired to set fuel surcharges in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. The appeals court’s decision has two key consequences. WebThe four largest U.S. railroad companies have urged the D.C. Circuit to exclude core evidence in long-running multidistrict litigation alleging a fuel surcharge price-fixing scheme, arguing...

UTC Case Docket Document Sets UTC

WebSep 13, 2024 · The appeal arose from multi-district litigation that consolidated eighteen antitrust actions. The plaintiffs alleged that the nation’s largest freight railroads conspired … WebRepresenting Southern Company, Ameren Corporation and NiSource in fuel surcharge-related antitrust litigation against four large railroads. ... ‘Andrew Tauber and I have worked together on dozens of railroad cases over the years. He is a master of multiple aspects of railroad law, particularly preemption under the FRSA and ICCTA. ... legacy of kain soul reaver voice actors

In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation

WebNov 14, 2007 · IN RE: RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION - MDL 1869. ... INC., KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY: Case Number: 1:2007mc00489: Filed: November 14, 2007: Court: US District Court for the District of … WebSep 7, 2024 · The case is In Re: Freight Rail Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 1:20-mc-00008-BAH. WebIn re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation - MDL No. 1869, 934 F.3d 619 (2024) 443 U.S.App.D.C. 86, 2024-2 Trade Cases P 80,879, 104 Fed.R.Serv.3d 638 © 2024 … legacy of kain timelines

In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litig. - Casetext

Transport: rail and road - litigation and regulation in United States ...

WebAug 9, 2013 · In re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION–MDL NO. 1869, BNSF Railway Company, et al., Petitioners. Appeal from the United States District … WebMay 16, 2024 · Case Documents. D.C. Circuit Opinion -- In re Rail Freight Surcharge Antitrust Litigation (D.C. Circuit).pdf. Defendants Opposition -- In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge … legacy of kain vampiresWebAug 9, 2013 · Following discovery, these plaintiffs sought certification of a class of shippers who paid the purportedly inflated fuel surcharges. See In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litig. (Fuel Surcharge II), 287 F.R.D. 1, 12 (D.D.C.2012). 3. As in any other case, obtaining certification required the plaintiffs to meet the two burdens ... legacy of kain ttrpg

"WebAug 31, 2024 · Case Summary On 08/31/2024 In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation was filed as an Other - Antitrust lawsuit. This case was filed in U.S. Courts Of … " - Railroad fuel surcharge antitrust case

Railroad fuel surcharge antitrust case

Riding the rails to stay ahead of inflation Fidelity Institutional

WebFeb 6, 2024 · On 02/06/2024 RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION NO II - MDL NO 2925 was filed as an Other - Antitrust lawsuit. This case was filed in U.S. … WebHughes Hubbard & Reed LLP • A New York Limited Liability Partnership. One Battery Park Plaza • New York, New York 10004-1482 • +1 (212) 837-6000

Did you know?

WebApr 3, 2015 · It found that railroad rates steadily increased since 2004, with a particularly steep increase in 2008. But the Christensen Report found that the rate increases were driven by fluctuating fuel prices and other costs and did not appear to reflect an undue exercise of market power. Overall, the study found a healthy rail industry that, since 2006 ... WebThe case is In re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation, case number 1:07-mc-00489 or MDL no. 1869, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. --Additional reporting by ...

WebIN RE: RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION-MDL No. 1 $69, DAKOTA GRANITE COMPANY, ON BEHALF OF ITSELF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED, ET AL., APPELLANTS V. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, ET AL., APPELLEES Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1 :07-mc-00489) Kathleen M Sullivan … WebIn the ongoing, seven-years-and-counting legal battle involving railroads and certain customers who have filed a class-action suit claiming that the railroads engaged in collusion to impose fuel surcharges, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in a matter involving the credibility of …

WebIn Re: Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation II. Cohen Milstein represents three of the world’s largest container shippers—Yang Ming, NYK, and “K” Line—in antitrust lawsuits … WebCase 1:11-cv-01049-PLF-GMH Document 203 Filed 07/13/20 Page 1 of 34 . IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA . In re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION . This Document Relates To: ALL CASES . OXBOW CARBON & MINERALS LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., et al., …

Webof a class of shippers who paid the purportedly inflated fuel surcharges. See In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litig. (Fuel Surcharge II), 287 F.R.D. 1, 12 (D.D.C. 2012). 3. As in any other case, obtaining certification required the plaintiffs to meet the two burdens prescribed inFederal Rule of Civil Procedure 23.

WebMay 3, 2013 · In re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION-MDL NO. 1869, BNSF Railway Company, et al., Petitioners. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued May 3, 2013. Decided August 9, 2013. Attorney (s) appearing for the Case Carter G. Phillips argued the cause for petitioners. legacy of karth set esoWebIN RE: RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II) MDL No. 2925 SCHEDULE A Northern District of Alabama VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY, ET AL. v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 2:19-01606 Central District of California HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, INC. v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, ET AL., C.A. No. 8:19-01880 legacy of karth locationWebIn re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litig., 258 F.R.D. at 168. The instant case is brought on behalf of shippers whose freight was not rate-regulated. Compl. ¶ 1. Rate-regulated freight refers to that freight which the Surface Transportation Board ("STB") has the authority to regulate. legacy of kain villainsWebNov 17, 2011 · Case Details Full title: In re: RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Document… Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Date published: Nov 17, 2011 Citations 281 F.R.D. 1 (D.D.C. 2011) 281 F.R.D. 12 81 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 105 81 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 99 Citing Cases Nguyen v. Vu legacy of kain wallpaperWebMay 16, 2024 · In re Rail Freight Fuel Surcharge Antitrust Litigation. U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Tab Group. Merits Stage. ... Case Status: Decided. Docket Number: 18-7010. Oral Argument Date: September 28, 2024. Issues: Class Actions and Mass Actions. Class Certification; legacy of kain voice actorsWebApr 12, 2024 · Filing Type: Fuel Surcharge Tariff. Case Status: Pending. Dates (Opened & Effective): 04/12/2024 & 05/27/2024. Summary: Less than statutory notice for Columbia River Disposal Special Fuel Surcharge Supplement No. 3 in the amount of 2.03 percent. To be effective May, 1 2024 and expire on May 31, 2024. The Company serves approximately … legacy of krypton episode 2 dcuoWebMar 2, 2024 · A rail fuel surcharge, as defined by the shippers, is a separately identified fee that is charged by the railroads for agreed upon transportation services, purportedly to … legacy of kain wiki